Expect a Jolt
When Opening
The Electric Bill
Rates Jump in Many States
As Utilities Pass On Surges
In Costs of Coal, Natural Gas
By REBECCA SMITH
May 7, 2008; Page D1
Surging fuel costs are about to inflict more pain on consumers, this time in the form of rapidly rising electricity bills.
Power prices are being pushed up across the U.S., with
increases sometimes soaring into double digits, due to costlier coal
and natural gas, the fuels used to make 70% of the nation's electricity.
BEHIND THE RISES
What's pushing up electricity rates:
• Soaring costs of coal and natural gas.
• Increase in equipment purchases by utilities.
• Deregulated markets that allow greater profits.
• Regulations that allow utilities to pass through costs quickly.
It usually takes awhile for fuel-price swings to show
up in electricity bills because utilities typically buy most of what
they need under long-term arrangements. As older contracts expire,
though, utilities are facing the reality of higher costs.
Proposed electricity-rate increases are cropping up all over the country. Potomac Edison Co., a unit of Allegheny Energy
Inc., is asking Virginia regulators for permission to raise rates in
July by 29%. In its rate request, the utility cited higher fuel and
purchased-power costs.
In Oregon, Portland General Electric Co. is seeking a
9% rate increase effective in January 2009, about a third of which is
attributable to higher fuel costs. "There's huge push-back against this
rate increase," said Bob Jenks, executive director of the Citizens'
Utility Board of Oregon, a group that represents consumers. The
increase would come on top of a 10% overall increase since January
2007, and he said customers fear rate "pancaking" in which small
increases add up to big jumps.
Company spokesman Steve Corson said Portland General
pursues "many, many small measures" to control expenses but can't do
much about fuel increases.
More than 90% of coal burned in the U.S. goes for
electricity production, and fuel is the industry's largest single
expense. Appalachian coal, which on Tuesday closed at $99.50 a ton,
costs more than twice as much as it did in the first months of 2007
when it fetched about $45 a ton. Natural gas, closing at $11.15 on
Tuesday, costs 45% more than it did early in 2007.
Rising global demand for coal and supply disruptions in Indonesia and Australia are also contributing to price pressures.
In the state of Washington, one retailer -- worried
about double-digit increases in energy costs -- has upped its
investment in renewable power and energy efficiency for its roughly 100
stores and distribution centers. Recreational Equipment Inc., Kent,
Wash., has saved $100,000 in the past year -- far more than it expected
-- because it's better protected against rising fossil-fuel costs, said
Kevin Hagen, the company's director of corporate social responsibility.
Its newest distribution center in Bedford, Pa., for example, has
efficient lighting and ventilation.
Electricity Auctions
Recent electricity auctions in Maryland and New Jersey
-- in which utilities buy electricity from deregulated generation
companies -- are exerting upward pressure on retail rates, and it's
likely to continue in coming months, indicating the worst is yet to
come.
In Maryland, for example, residential customers of Baltimore Gas & Electric Co., a unit of Constellation Energy Group
Inc., will see a 7.6% increase in their bills in June as a result of
the latest wholesale auction conducted in April. (Under the state's
deregulation law, utilities sold their plants to competitive suppliers
and now get power off the open market.)
An average home bill will jump $137 a year to about
$1,800 annually, said the Maryland Public Service Commission.
Commercial customers will be hit even harder, with 27% to 41% price
increases for the June through August period, versus prices a year
earlier.
In New Jersey, an energy auction in February resulted
in power prices based on natural-gas costs of about $8.50 per million
British thermal units, said Ralph Izzo, chief executive of Public Service Enterprise Group
Inc., a big utility company. But natural-gas prices projected for early
next year are about 30% higher, or roughly $11 a unit, showing more
increases could lie ahead.
Mr. Izzo said he thinks utility regulators will apply
more pressure on utilities to cut costs they can control and will take
a hard look at profit levels. "Regulators respond to social pressures
and public forces," he said. "Regulators will be hard-pressed to allow
the same returns on equity [for utilities] as in the past."
Atlanta coal-burning utility Southern
Co. said its fuel costs jumped 12% in the first quarter, versus the
first quarter of 2007. Southern's utilities buy fuel under contracts as
long as five years to minimize the impact of any single year.
Southern's biggest utility, Georgia Power Co., is seeking a $222
million rate increase but may increase that number as fuel prices
continue to soar.
The impact of higher fossil fuel prices is felt beyond
just the price of electricity. It is also provoking states to explore
expansion of nuclear power plants and renewable energy, such as wind
and solar power, to break the grip of fossil fuels.
Last week, Ohio became the latest state to take a
tentative step away from fossil fuels. Democratic Gov. Ted Strickland
signed legislation requiring electric utilities to satisfy one quarter
of their customers' energy needs, by 2025, through such means as
renewable energy, new nuclear reactors and energy efficiency measures.
"There's definitely interplay between fuel costs going
up and the willingness of states to invest in other sorts of
resources," said Mr. Strickland.
Some Profits Seen
Of course, it follows that high costs, for some, could result in higher profits, for others.
The companies that appear to be doing the best, so far
this earnings season, are those firms in deregulated power markets,
where price increases in raw materials can be readily passed on to
consumers and where generators with the highest costs set overall
market prices.
Duke Energy
Corp.'s commercial power unit, for example, earned $146 million for the
first quarter, versus $13 million a year ago, an increase the company
credited to several things, including successful hedging and better
profit from its gas-fired generating plants in the Midwest. Power
production also increased.
FPL Group
Inc. in Juno Beach, Fla., last week reported that its deregulated power
plants gleaned nearly four times as much profit in the first quarter of
2008 as a year earlier. Meanwhile, Potomac's parent company, Allegheny
Energy, reported a 24% increase in net income for the first quarter,
crediting part of the boost on higher prices for wholesale electricity
sales.
Write to Rebecca Smith at
This e-mail address is being protected from spam bots, you need JavaScript enabled to view it
|